Prosecuting Suspected Terrorists: The Role of the Civilian Courts

نویسندگان

  • Stephen J. Schulhofer
  • George W. Bush
چکیده

A the George W. Bush Administration has successfully prosecuted dozens of terrorism cases in the federal courts since the 9/11 attacks,1 Administration officials and other observers continue to argue that we need a special forum or specialized procedures for at least some sorts of terrorism cases. The principal concern has been that the rights available in federal court—especially the defendant’s rights to confront the evidence against him, to obtain evidence in his favor, and to be tried in a public proceeding—could jeopardize classified information that must be kept secret. On the other hand, any process that compromises these rights can unfairly hamper a defendant’s ability to defend himself and can open the door to the abuse of executive power. One attempt to solve this problem has taken the form of an entirely new system of tribunals—the military commissions designed to try terrorism suspects under rules of procedure and evidence crafted specifically with terrorism prosecutions in mind. That approach, ostensibly intended to streamline the trial process and avoid the supposed complexities of federal criminal procedure, has thus far had the opposite effect. While terrorism prosecutions in the federal courts have proceeded with no more complication and delay than attend any complex criminal case, the military commissions have been mired in litigation and have yet to result in a single trial.2 At the same time, the military commission system, though it has yet to yield any discernable benefits for the United States, has hampered cooperation with European allies and exacted heavy reputational costs that damage our effectiveness in many ways. If the military commission system itself is unnecessary, moreover, those costs are entirely needless. The need for a special system of tribunals has been wildly exaggerated. The federal courts are already well-equipped to protect classified information and to handle all the other supposed complexities of terrorism trials. Quite simply, terrorism suspects

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Role of Judicial Procedure Courts in the Development of Iranian Administrative Law

 Today, in leading administrative law systems, the judicial process along with the law is the most important source of legal rules, and the law alone can not feed the legal system. Although in the administrative law system of Iran, the use of judicial procedure has often been considered as a source and interpretation of the law and not as the main source, but the role of administrative courts, ...

متن کامل

Records Management Theory's Dilemma: What is a Record? Joshua Finnell

In the Euthyphro, Socrates encounters Euthyphro outside the courts where both are enroute to trials pertaining to piety. Euthyphro is prosecuting his father for murder, while Socrates is on trial for engaging in impious acts. In the course of their conversation Socrates questions whether prosecuting one's own father is impious, especially after Euthyphro boldly claims his act is not (Plato, 200...

متن کامل

The Long Small War: Indigenous Forces for Counterinsurgency

T he United States and its partners are prosecuting a protracted war against insurgents and terrorists who are animated by an ideology stemming from a radical fundamentalist interpretation of Islam. As of early 2006, the American national security bureaucracy began to use the appellation the “long war” in place of the Global War on Terrorism. At least one document describes this long war as the...

متن کامل

بررسی امکان تطبیق عنوان محاربه یا افساد فی‌الارض بر انتقال آگاهانه ویروس عامل ایدز، در حقوق کیفری ایران؛ با نظر به آرای صادره در ایالات متحده آمریکا

Prosecuting HIV Transmission by Muharaba & Ifsad-Fel-Arz depends on spreading AIDS in a vast area without particular attention to specific victims. Because using any kinds of weapons is a required condition for committing Muharaba based on Article 279 Iranian Islamic Penal Code. Therefore, in order to prosecute HIV mass transmission by Muharaba, we should either argue that there is no necessity...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008